Attrattività fisica: differenze tra le versioni

Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera.
Vai alla navigazione Vai alla ricerca
Differenza successiva →
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
VisualeWikitesto
←Nuova pagina: {{double image|right|Venus de Milo Louvre Ma399 n4.jpg|180|Adonis Mazarin Louvre MR239.jpg|150| LaVenere di Milo esposta al Louvre è stata definita come un "mo...
(Nessuna differenza)

Versione delle 13:05, 11 mar 2012

Template:Double image Il termine Attrattività fisica si riferisce al grado in cui i tratti fisici di una persona sono considerati esteticamente piacevoli oppure belli. Il termine spesso implicaattrazione sessuale o desiderabilità, ma può essere distinto dai due; per esempio, gli uomini trovano la giovinezza attraente per varie ragioni, ma senza attrazione sessuale. Molti fattori influenzano l'attrazione di una persona verso un'altra e l'aspetto fisico è uno di questi. In molti casi gli esseri umani attribuiscono caratteristiche positive, come intelligenza ed onestà, alle persone fisicamente attraenti senza esserne consci.[1]

I maschi, generalmente, tendono ad essere attratti da donne che siano più basse di loro, che abbiano un aspetto giovanile, e che esibiscono caratteristiche come simmetria facciale,[2] seno prosperoso, labbra carnose e un basso rapporto tra larghezza della vita e delle anche.[3] Le donne, generalmente, sono invece attratte dagli uomini più alti di loro, che esibiscono un elevato grado di simmetria facciale e di dimorfismo facciale mascolino, che abbiano ampie spalle, una vita relativamente larga e un torso a forma di V.[4][5]

Fattori generali

Generally, physical attraction can be studied from a number of perspectives, including universal perceptions common to all human cultures, cultural and social aspects, and individual subjective preferences. Additionally, the perception of attractiveness can have a significant effect on how people are judged in terms of employment or social opportunities, friendship, sexual behavior, and marriage.[6]

Some physical features are attractive in both men and women, particularly bodily[7] and facial symmetry,[8][9][10][11] although one contrary report suggests that "absolute flawlessness" with perfect symmetry can be "disturbing".[12] Symmetry may be evolutionarily beneficial as a sign of health because asymmetry "signals past illness or injury".[13] One study suggested people were able to "gauge beauty at a subliminal level" by seeing only a glimpse of a picture for one-hundredth of a second.[13] Other important factors include youthfulness, skin clarity and smoothness of skin; and "vivid color" in the eyes and hair.[8] However, there are numerous differences based on gender.

Male physical attractiveness

Women, on average, tend to be more attracted to men who have a relatively narrow waist, a V-shaped torso, and broad shoulders, are taller than they are, and display a high-degree of facial symmetry, and relatively masculine facial dimorphism.[4][5] With regard to male-male-attractiveness, one source reports that the most important factor that attracts gay men to other males is the man's physical attractiveness.[14]

Facial attractiveness

Sexual dimorphism

Studies have shown that ovulating heterosexual women (and homosexual men) prefer faces with masculine traits associated with increased exposure to testosterone during key developmental stages, such as prominent and broad cheekbones,[15] a relatively longer lower face, developed brows, and chiseled jawlines. The masculinity of male faces (and the femininity of female faces) is described as a sexual dimorphism. Female respondents in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (n = 55) were significantly more likely to choose a masculine face than those in menses and luteal phases (n = 84),[16] (or in those taking hormonal contraception).[4][5][17] It is suggested that the masculinity of facial features is a reliable indication of good health, or, alternatively, that masculine-looking males are more likely to achieve high status.[18] However, the correlation between attractive facial features and health has been questioned.[19] Sociocultural factors, such as self-perceived attractiveness, status in a relationship and degree of gender-conformity, have been reported to play a role in female preferences for male faces.[20] Studies have found that women who perceive themselves as physically attractive are more likely to choose men with masculine facial dimorphism, than are women who perceive themselves as physically unattractive.[21] In men, facial masculinity significantly correlates with facial symmetry—it has been suggested that both are signals of developmental stability and genetic health.[22] One study called into question the importance of facial masculinity in physical attractiveness in men arguing that when perceived health, which is factored into facial masculinity, is discounted it makes little difference in physical attractiveness.[23] In a cross-country study involving 4,794 women in their early twenties, a difference was found in women's average "masculinity preference" between countries.[24]

Symmetry

Symmetrical faces and bodies may be signs of good inheritance to women of child-bearing age seeking to create healthy offspring. Studies suggest women are more attracted to men with symmetrical faces,[25] and symmetrical faces correlate with long term mental performance[26] and are an indication that a man has experienced "fewer genetic and environmental disturbances such as diseases, toxins, malnutrition or genetic mutations" while growing.[26] Since achieving symmetry is a difficult task during human growth, requiring literally billions of cell reproductions while maintaining a parallel structure, achieving symmetry is a visible signal of genetic health.

Studies have also suggested that women at peak fertility were more likely to fantasize about men with greater facial symmetry,[27] and other studies have found that male symmetry was the only factor that could significantly predict the likelihood of a woman experiencing orgasm during sex. Women with partners possessing greater symmetry reported significantly more copulatory female orgasms than were reported by women with partners possessing low symmetry, even with many potential confounding variables controlled.[28] This finding has been found to hold across different cultures. It has been argued that masculine facial dimorphism (in men) and symmetry in faces are signals advertising genetic quality in potential mates.[29] Low facial and body fluctuating asymmetry may indicate good health and intelligence, which are desirable features.[30] Studies have found that women who perceive themselves as being more physically attractive are more likely to favor men with a higher degree of facial symmetry, than are women who perceive themselves as being less physically attractive.[21] It has been found that symmetrical men (and women) have a tendency to begin to have sexual intercourse at an earlier age, to have more sexual partners, and to have more one-night stands. They are also more likely to be prone to infidelity.[31] A study of quarterbacks in the National Football League found a positive correlation between facial symmetry and salaries.[9]

Body scent

Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Body odor.

A number of double-blind studies have found that women prefer the scent of men who are rated as facially attractive.[32] For example, a study by Anja Rikowski and Karl Grammer had individuals rate the scent of t-shirts slept in by test subjects. The photographs of those subjects were independently rated, and Rikowski and Grammar found that both males and females were more attracted to the natural scent of individuals who had been rated by consensus as facially attractive.[33] Additionally, it has also been shown that women have a preference for the scent of men with more symmetrical faces, and that women's preference for the scent of more symmetrical men is strongest during the most fertile period of their menstrual cycle. Within the set of normally cycling women, individual women's preference for the scent of men with high facial symmetry correlated with their probability of conception.[34]

Genetics

Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Heterozygote advantage e Major Histocompatibility Complex and Sexual Selection.

Studies have explored the genetic basis behind such issues as facial symmetry and body scent and how they influence physical attraction. In one study in which women wore men's T-shirts, researchers found that women were more attracted to the bodily scents in shirts of men who had a different type of gene section within the DNA called Major histocompatibility complex (MHC).[35] MHC is a large gene area within the DNA of vertebrates which encodes proteins dealing with the immune system[36] and which influences individual bodily odors.[37] One hypothesis is that humans are naturally attracted by the sense of smell and taste to others with dissimilar MHC sections, perhaps to avoid subsequent inbreeding while increasing the genetic diversity of offspring.[36] Further, there are studies showing that women's natural attraction for men with dissimilar immune profiles can be distorted with use of birth control pills.[37] Other research findings involving the genetic foundations of attraction suggest that MHC heterozygosity positively correlates with male facial attractiveness. Women judge the faces of men who are heterozygous at all three MHC loci to be more attractive than the faces of men who are homozygous at one or more of these loci. Additionally, a second experiment with genotyped women raters, found these preferences were independent of the degree of MHC similarity between the men and the female rater. With MHC heterozygosity independently seen as a genetic advantage, the results suggest that facial attractiveness in men may be a measure of genetic quality.[38][39]

Youth

For the Romans especially, "beardlessness" and "smooth young bodies" were considered beautiful to both men and women.[40] For Greek and Roman men, the most desirable traits of boys were their "youth" and "hairlessness". Pubescent boys were considered a socially appropriate object of male desire, while post-pubescent boys were considered to be "ἔξωροι" or "past the prime".[40] This was largely in the context of pederastry (adult male interest in adolescent boys).

Today, men and women's attitudes towards male beauty has changed. For example, body hair on men may even be preferred (see below).

Waist-to-chest ratio

The mesomorphic physique of a slim waist, broad shoulders and muscular chest are often found to be attractive.[41] When asked to rate other men, both heterosexual and homosexual men found low waist-to-chest ratios (WCR) to be more attractive on other men with the gay men showing a preference for lower WCR (more V-shaped) than the straight men.[42]

Genitalia

Studies based in China, England, the United States, Italy, New Zealand, Sweden, Spain, and France have suggested that women consider men more attractive whose erect penis is longer and thicker.[43] However, length of the flaccid penis does not necessarily correspond to length of the erect penis; some smaller flaccid penises grow much longer, while some larger flaccid penises grow comparatively less.[44]

Height and erect posture

Females' sexual attraction towards males may be determined by the height of the man.[45] Height in men is associated with status or wealth in many cultures (in particular those where malnutrition is common),[46] which is beneficial to women romantically involved with them. One study conducted of women's personal ads support the existence of this preference; the study found that in ads requesting height in a mate, 80% requested a height of 6,00 piedi (1,83 m) or taller.[46] However, this percentage was only of ads specifying height, and therefore possibly self-selected and/or biased by a third factor such as female height. Recent studies have shown that heterosexual women often prefer men taller than they are, rather than a man with above average height. While women usually desire men to be at least the same height as themselves or taller, several other factors also determine male attractiveness, and the male-taller norm is not universal.[47] In certain non-Western cultures, the relative heights of partners have been shown to be irrelevant in their choice of mate, which suggests that Western height preferences may be sociocultural, rather than genetic, in nature.[47] Professor Adam Eyre-Walker, from the University of Sussex, stated that there is, as yet, no evidence that these preferences are evolutionary preferences, as opposed to merely cultural preferences.[48] In a double-blind study by Graziano et al, it was found that, in person, using a sample of women of normal size, they were on average most attracted to men who were of medium height (5'9"- 5'11") and less attracted to both men of shorter height (5'5"- 5'7") and men of tallest height (6'2"- 6'4").[49]

Additionally, women seem more receptive to an erect posture than men, though both prefer it as an element of beauty.[46] According to one study (Yee N., 2002), gay men who identify as "Only Tops" tend to prefer shorter men, while gay men who identify as "Only Bottoms" tend to prefer taller men.[50]

Hairiness

Studies based in the United States, New Zealand, and China have shown that women rate men with no body hair as most attractive, and that attractiveness ratings decline as hirsutism increases.[51][52] Another study, however, found that moderate amounts of trunk hair on men was most attractive, to the sample of British and Sri Lankan women.[53] Further, a degree of hirsuteness (hairiness) and a waist-to-shoulder ratio of 0.6 is often preferred, when combined with a mesomorphic physique.[53]

In a study using Finnish women, women with hairy fathers were more likely to prefer hairy men, suggesting that preference for hairy men is either the result of genetics or imprinting.[54] Among gay men, another study (Yee N., 2002) reported gay males who identify as "Only Tops" prefer less hairy men, while gay males who identify as "Only Bottoms" prefer hairier men.[50]

Skin color

Testosterone has been shown to darken skin color in laboratory experiments.[55] In his foreword to Peter Frost's 2005 Fair Women, Dark Men, University of Washington sociologist Pierre L. van den Berghe writes: "Although virtually all cultures express a marked preference for fair female skin, even those with little or no exposure to European imperialism, and even those whose members are heavily pigmented, many are indifferent to male pigmentation or even prefer men to be darker."[56]

According to one study (Yee N., 2002), gay men who identify as "Only Tops" tend to prefer lighter-skinned men while gay men who identify as "Only Bottoms" tend to prefer darker-skinned men.[50]

More recent research has suggested that redder and yellower skin tones,[57] reflecting higher levels of oxygenated blood,[58] melanin pigment and net dietary intakes of fruit and vegetables,[59] appears healthier, and therefore more attractive.[60]

Female physical attractiveness

Template:Double image Attractiveness research indicates that men tend to be attracted to young[61] and beautiful women[62] with bodily symmetry.[63] Rather than decreasing it, modernity has only increased the emphasis men place on women's looks.[64] Evolutionary psychologists attribute such attraction to an evaluation of the fertility potential in a prospective mate.[61]

Facial features

A University of Toronto study found that ideal facial proportions were close to the average of all female profiles.[65]
Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Cuteness e Koinophilia.

Attractiveness research has attempted to determine which facial aspects communicate attractiveness. Facial symmetry has been shown to be considered attractive in women,[66][67] and men have been found to prefer full lips,[68] a high forehead, small chin, small nose and a shorter, narrow jaw, defined cheekbones,[69][70] clear smooth skin, and large, clear eyes.[61] The shape of the face in terms of "how everything hangs together" is an important determinant of beauty.[71] A University of Toronto study found correlations between facial measurements and attractiveness; researchers varied the distance between eyes, and between eyes and mouth, in different drawings of the same female face, and had the drawings evaluated; they found there were ideal proportions perceived as attractive (see photo).[65] These proportions (46% and 36%) were close to the average of all female profiles.[65] Women with thick, dark limbal rings in their eyes have also been found to be more attractive. The explanation given is that because the ring tends to fade with age and medical problems, a prominent limbal ring gives an honest indicator of youth.[72]

In another cross-cultural study, more neotenized (i.e., youthful looking) female faces were found to be most attractive to men while less neotenized female faces were found to be less attractive to men, regardless of the females' actual age.[73] One of these desired traits was a small jaw.[74] In a study of Italian women who have won beauty competitions, it was found that their faces had more "babyness" traits than those of the "normal" women used as a reference.[75]

Michael R. Cunningham of the Department of Psychology at the University of Louisville found, using a panel of "Asian", "Hispanic" and "White" judges, that the "Asian", "Hispanic" and "White" female faces found most attractive were those that had "neonate large eyes, greater distance between eyes, and small noses"[76] and his study led him to conclude that "large eyes" were the most "effective" of the "neonate cues".[76] Cunningham also said that "shiny" hair may be indicative of "neonate vitality".[76] Using a panel of "Blacks" and "Whites" as judges, Cunningham found more neotenous faces were perceived as having both higher "femininity" and "sociability".[76] In contrast, Cunningham found that faces that were "low in neoteny" were judged as "intimidating".[76] Cunningham noted a "difference" in the preferences of "Asian" and "White" judges with "Asian" judges preferring women with "less mature faces" and smaller mouths than the "White" judges.[76] Cunningham hypothesized that this difference in preference may stem from "ethnocentrism" since "Asian faces possess those qualities", so Cunningham re-analyzed the data with "11 Asian targets excluded" and concluded that "ethnocentrism was not a primary determinant of Asian preferences."[76] Rather than finding evidence for purely "neonate" faces being most appealing, Cunningham found faces with "sexually-mature" features at the "periphery" of the face combined with "neonate" features in the "center of the face" most appealing in men and women.[76] Upon analyzing the results of his study Cunningham concluded that preference for "neonate features may display the least cross-cultural variability" in terms of "attractiveness ratings".[76] and, in another study, Cunningham concluded that there exists a large agreement on the characteristics of an attractive face.[77][78]

In computer face averaging tests, women with averaged faces have been shown to be considered more attractive.[11][79] This is possibly due to average features being more familiar and, therefore, more comfortable.[66]

Commenting on the prevalence of whiteness in supposed beauty ideals in his book White Lies: Race and the Myth of Whiteness, Maurice Berger notes that the schematic rendering in the idealized face of a notable study conducted with American subjects had "straight hair," "light skin," "almond-shaped eyes," "thin, arched eyebrows," "a long, thin nose, closely set and tiny nostrils" and "a large mouth and thin lips",[80] though the author of the study noted the consistency between his results and those conducted on other races.

One psychologist speculated there were two opposing principles of female beauty: prettiness and rarity. So on average, symmetrical features are one ideal, while unusual, stand-out features are another.[81] A study performed by the University of Toronto found that the most attractive facial dimensions were those found in the average female face. However, that particular University of Toronto study looked only at white women.[82]

Youthfulness

Cross-cultural data shows that the reproductive success of women is tied to their youth and physical attractiveness[83] such as the pre-industrial Sami where the most reproductively successful women were 15 years younger than their man.[84] One study covering 37 cultures showed that, on average, a woman was 2.5 years younger than her male partner, with the age difference in Nigeria and Zambia being at the far extreme of 6.5 to 7.5 years. As men age, they tend to seek a mate who is even younger.[61] The common explanation for this preference is that men have evolved to be attracted to women with high child-bearing potential and therefore prefer young women. In a small (n=148) study performed in the United States using male college students at one university, the mean age expressed as ideal for a wife was found to be 16.87 years old, while 17.76 was the mean ideal age for a brief sexual encounter; however, the study sets up a framework where "taboos against sex with young girls" are purposely diminished, and biased their sample by removing any participant over the age of 30, with a mean participant age of 19.83.[85] In a study of penile tumescence, men were found most aroused by pictures of young adult females.[86]

Breasts

Research has shown that some men enjoy viewing women's breasts,[87] and another study showed that men prefer symmetrical breasts,[63][88] but some studies show men preferring large, firm breasts,[89][90] while a contradictory study of British undergraduates found men preferring small breasts on women.[91] Cross-culturally, another study found "high variability" regarding the ideal breast size.[91] Some researchers have speculated that a preference for larger breasts may have developed in Western societies because women with larger breasts tend to have higher levels of the hormones oestradial and progesterone, which both promote fertility.[92]

Breast symmetry may be particularly sensitive to developmental disturbances and the symmetry differences for breasts are large compared to other body parts. Women who have more symmetrical breasts tend to have more children.[93]

Buttocks

Biological anthropologist, Helen B. Fisher of the Center for Human Evolution Studies in the Department of Anthropology of Rutgers University, said that, "perhaps", "the fleshy, rounded buttocks... attracted males during rear-entry intercourse."[94] Bobbi S. Low et al. of the School of Natural Resources and Environment at the University of Michigan, said the female "buttocks evolved in the context of females competing for the attention and parental commitment of powerful resource-controlling males" as an "honest display of fat reserves" that could not be confused with another type of tissue,[95] although T. M. Caro, professor in the Center for Population Biology and the Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, at University of California, Davis, rejected that as being a necessary conclusion, stating that female fatty deposits on the hips improve "individual fitness of the female", regardless of sexual selection.[95]

Body mass

Betty Grable's iconic pin-up girl photo, popular among GIs fighting in World War II

Body Mass Index (BMI) is an important determinant to the perception of beauty.[96] Even though the Western ideal is for a thin woman, some cultures prefer plumper women,[76][97] which has been argued to support that attraction for a particular BMI merely is a cultural artifact.[97] The attraction for a proportionate body also influences an appeal for erect posture.[91]

Availability of food influences which female body size is attractive which may have evolutionary reasons. Societies with food scarcities prefer larger female body size than societies having plenty of food. In Western society males who are hungry prefer a larger female body size than they do when not hungry.[98]

In the United States, women overestimate men's preferences for thinness in a mate. In one study, American women were asked to choose what their ideal build was and what they thought the build most attractive to men was. Women chose slimmer than average figures for both choices. When American men were independently asked to choose the female build most attractive to them, the men chose figures of average build. This indicates that women may be misled as to how thin men prefer women to be.[97] Some speculate that thinness as a beauty standard is one way in which women judge each other.[81] A reporter surmised that thinness is prized among women as a "sign of independence, strength and achievement."[81] Some implicated the fashion industry for the promulgation of the notion of thinness as attractive.[99]

Waist–hip ratio

Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Waist–hip ratio.

Ethnic groups vary with regard to their ideal waist-to-hip ratio for women,[100] ranging from 0.6 in China,[101] to 0.8 or 0.9 in parts of South America and Africa,[102][103][104] and divergent preferences based on ethnicity, rather than nationality, have also been noted.[105][106] A cross-cultural analysis that found isolated peoples preferring high WHR (0.9) over a low WHR (0.7) suggested that many such "cross-cultural" tests "may have only reflected the pervasiveness of Western media";[107] however many evolutionary psychologists believe preference for low WHR is a signal for fertility and biologically based.[108]

Height

Most men tend to be taller than their female partner.[109] It has been found that, in Western societies, most men prefer shorter women and tend to view taller women as less attractive.[110] and people view couples where the woman is taller to be less ideal.[110] Women who are 0.7 to 1.7 standard deviations below the mean female height have been reported to be the most reproductively successful,[111] since fewer tall women get married compared to shorter women.[110]

However, in some non-Western cultures, height is irrelevant in choosing a mate, which suggests that the preference among Western men for women shorter than themselves may be sociocultural in nature.[47]

Leg-to-body ratio

A study using Polish participants by Sorokowski found 5% longer legs than an individual used as a reference was considered most attractive.[112] The study concluded this preference might stem from the influence of leggy runway models.[113] The Sorokowski study was criticized for using a picture of the same person with digitally altered leg lengths which Dr. Marco Bertamini felt were unrealistic.[114] Another study using British and American participants, found "mid-ranging" leg-to-body ratios to be most ideal.[115]

A study by Swami et al. of British male and female undergraduates showed a preference for men with legs as long as the rest of their body and women with 40% longer legs than the rest of their body.[116] The researcher concluded that this preference might be influenced by American culture where long legged women are portrayed as more attractive.[116] The Swami et al. study was criticized for using a picture of the same person with digitally altered leg lengths which Marco Bertamini felt were unrealistic.[114] Bertamini also criticized the Swami study for only changing the leg length while keeping the arm length constant.[114] Bertamini's own study which used stick figures mirrored Swami's study, however, by finding a preference for leggier women.[114]

According to some studies, most men prefer women with small feet,[117][118] such as in ancient China where foot binding was practiced.[119]

Hair

Men have been found to prefer long-haired women.[61][120][121] An evolutionary psychology explanation for this is that malnutrition and deficiencies in minerals and vitamins causes loss of hair or hair changes. Hair therefore indicates health and nutrition during the last 2–3 years. Lustrous hair is also often a cross-cultural preference.[122]

One study reported non-Asian men to prefer blondes and Asian men to prefer black-haired women.[121]

Movement patterns

The way an individual moves can indicate health and even age and influence attractiveness.[122]

Skin tone and skin radiance

Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Human skin color § Social status and racism.

A preference for lighter-skinned women has remained prevalent over time, even in cultures without European contact, though exceptions have been found.[123] Anthropologist Peter Frost stated that since higher-ranking men were allowed to marry the perceived more attractive women, who tended to have fair skin, the upper classes of a society generally tended to develop a lighter complexion than the lower classes by sexual selection (see also Fisherian runaway).[56][123][124] In contrast, one study on men of the Bikosso tribe in Cameroon found no preference for attractiveness of females based on lighter skin color, bringing into question the universality of earlier studies that had exclusively focused on skin color preferences among non-African populations.[124]

Today, skin bleaching is not uncommon in parts of the world such as Africa,[125] and a preference for lighter-skinned women generally holds true for African Americans,[126] Latin Americans,[127] and Asians.[128] One exception to this has been in contemporary Western culture, where tanned skin used to be associated with the sun-exposed manual labor of the lower-class, but has generally been considered more attractive and healthier since the mid-20th century.[129][130][131][132][133]

More recent work has extended skin color research beyond preferences for lightness, arguing that redder (higher a* in the CIELab colour space) and yellower (higher b*) skin has healthier appearance.[57] These preferences have been attributed to higher levels of red oxygenated blood in the skin, which is associated with aerobic fitness and lack of cardiac and respiratory illnesses,[58] and to higher levels of yellow-red antioxidant carotenoids in the skin, indicative of more fruit and vegetables in the diet and, possibly more efficient immune and reproductive systems.[59]

Research has additionally shown that skin radiance or glowing skin indicates health, thus skin radiance influences perception of beauty and physical attractiveness.[134][135]

Other determinants

There has been research suggesting that women at the "fertile stage" of the menstrual cycle appear more attractive to single unattached men, but it is not clear exactly how this process works.[136]

Possible gender differences for preferences

For both men and women, there appear to be universal criteria of attractiveness both within and across cultures and ethnic groups.[2][137] Some studies have concluded that, in particular with regard to long-term relationships, men place a higher emphasis on physical attractiveness in a partner than women do.[138][139][140][141][142] On the other hand, some studies have found little difference between men and women in terms of the weight they place on physical characteristics when choosing partners for short-term relationships,[143][144][145][146] in particular with regard to their implicit, as opposed to explicitly articulated, preferences.[147] Other recent studies continue to find sex differences for long-term relationships.[148][149][150][151]

Some evolutionary psychologists, including David Buss, have argued that this long-term relationship difference may be consequence of ancestral humans who selected partners based on secondary sexual characteristics, as well as general indicators of fitness which allowed for greater reproductive success as a result of higher fertility in those partners,[152] although a male's ability to provide resources for offspring was likely signaled less by physical features.[140] It is argued that the most prominent indicator of fertility in women is youth,[153][154] while the traits in a man which enhance reproductive success are proxies for his ability to accrue resources and protect.[154]

Studies have shown that women pay greater attention to physical traits than they do directly to earning capability or potential to commit,[155] including muscularity, fitness and masculinity of features; the latter preference was observed to vary during a woman's period, with women preferring more masculine features during the late-follicular (fertile) phase of the menstrual cycle.[156][157] Additionally, women process physical attractiveness differently, paying attention to both individual features and the aesthetic effect of the whole face.[158] A 2003 study in the area concluded that heterosexual women are about equally aroused when viewing men or women. Heterosexual men were only aroused by women. This study verified arousal in the test subjects by connecting them to brain imaging devices.[159][160][161][162] Notably, the same study reported arousal for women upon viewing animals mating.

It has been shown that women prefer men with a more masculine facial dimorphism during the fertile period of the menstrual cycle and men with a more feminine facial dimorphism during other parts of the cycle.[163] This distinction supports the sexy son hypothesis, which posits that it is evolutionarily advantageous for women to select potential fathers who are more genetically attractive,[164] rather than the best caregivers.[165]

According to strategic pluralism theory, men may have correspondingly evolved to pursue reproductive strategies that are contingent on their own physical attractiveness. More physically attractive men accrue reproductive benefits from spending more time seeking multiple mating partners and relatively less time investing in offspring. In contrast, the reproductive effort of physically less attractive men, who therefore will not have the same mating opportunities, is better allocated either to investing heavily in accruing resources, or investing in their mates and offspring and spending relatively less time seeking additional mates.[166]

Facial similarity and racial bias

Several studies have suggested that people are generally attracted to people who look like them[167] and they generally evaluate faces that exhibit features of their own ethnic or racial group as being more attractive.[121] Although both men and women use children's "facial resemblance" to themselves in "attractiveness judgments," a greater percentage of women in one study (37% n=30) found hypothetical children whose faces were "self-morphs" of themselves as most attractive when compared to men (30% n=23).[168] However, one report in The Guardian suggested there was a "Caucasian beauty standard" spreading worldwide because of the proliferation of the Western entertainment industry.[2]

The more similar a judged person is toward the judging person, the more the former is liked. However, this effect can be reversed. This might depend on how attractiveness is conceptualized: similar members (compared to dissimilar ones) of the opposite sex are judged as more likable in a prosocial sense. Again, findings are more ambiguous when looking for the desiring, pleasure related component of attractiveness.[169] This might be influenced by the measure one uses (subjective ratings can differ from the way one actually reacts) and by situational factors: while men usually prefer women whose face resembles their own, this effect can reverse under stress, when dissimilar females are preferred.[170]

Social effects

Perceptions of physical attractiveness contribute to generalized assumptions based on those attractions. Across cultures, what is beautiful is assumed to be good; attractive people are assumed to be more extroverted, popular, and happy. This could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, as from a young age, attractive people receive more attention that helps them develop these characteristics.[171][172] In one study, beautiful people were found to be generally happier than less beautiful or plain people, perhaps because beauty led to increased economic benefits which partially explained the increased happiness.[71]

However, attractiveness varies by society; in ancient China, a small foot was considered attractive, so foot binding was practiced by confining young girls' feet in tightly bound shoes to prevent the feet from growing to normal size.[173] In England, women used to wear corsets that severely constricted their breathing and damaged vital internal organs, in order to achieve a visual effect of an exaggeratedly low Waist-to-Hip ratio.

People make judgments of physical attractiveness based on what they see, but also on what they know about the person. Specifically, perceptions of beauty are malleable such that information about the person's personality traits can influence one's assessment of another person's physical beauty. A 2007 study had participants first rate pictures for attractiveness. After doing distracting math problems, participants saw the pictures again, but with information about the person's personality. When participants learned that a person had positive personality characteristics (e.g., smart, funny, kind), that person was seen as more physically attractive.[174] Conversely, a person with negative personality characteristics (e.g., materialistic, rude, untrustworthy) was seen as less physically attractive. This was true for both females and males.

Physical attractiveness can have various effects. A survey conducted by London Guildhall University of 11,000 people showed that those who subjectively describe themselves as physically attractive earn more income than others who would describe themselves as less attractive.[175] People who described themselves as less attractive earned, on average, 13% less than those who described themselves as more attractive, while the penalty for being overweight was around 5%. It is important to note that other factors such as self-confidence may explain or influence these findings as they are based on self-reported attractiveness as opposed to any sort of objective criteria; however, as one's self-confidence and self-esteem are largely learned from how one is regarded by his/her peers while maturing, even these considerations would suggest a significant role for physical appearance. One writer speculated that "the distress created in women by the spread of unattainable ideals of female beauty" might possibly be linked to increasing incidence of depression.[176]

Many have asserted that certain advantages tend to come to those who are perceived as being more attractive, including the ability to get better jobs and promotions; receiving better treatment from authorities and the legal system; having more choices in romantic partners and, therefore, more power in relationships; and marrying into families with more money.[10][71][171][172][177] Men and women use physical attractiveness as a measure of how "good" another person is.[178] Discrimination against or prejudice towards others based on their appearance is sometimes referred to as lookism.

Some researchers conclude that little difference exists between men and women in terms of sexual behavior.[179][180] Symmetrical men and women have a tendency to begin to have sexual intercourse at an earlier age, to have more sexual partners, to engage in a wider variety of sexual activities, and to have more one-night stands. They are also prone to infidelity and are more likely to have open relationships.[31] Additionally, they have the most reproductive success. Therefore, their physical characteristics are most likely to be inherited by future generations.[181][182][183][184]

Concern for improving physical attractiveness has led many persons to consider alternatives such as cosmetic surgery. It has led scientists working with related disciplines such as computer imaging and mathematics to conduct research to suggest ways to surgically alter a face in terms of distances between facial features, to make it closer to an ideal face with "agreed-upon standards of attractiveness", by using algorithms to suggest an alternative which still resembles the current face.[8] One research study found that cosmetic surgery as a way to "boost earnings" was "not profitable in a monetary sense."[71]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E, What is beautiful is good, in J Pers Soc Psychol, vol. 24, n. 3, December 1972, pp. 285–90, DOI:10.1037/h0033731.
  2. ^ a b c Joanna Briscoe, Haven't I seen you somewhere before?, The Guardian, 17 January 2004. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  3. ^ Daniel Nettle: Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. The Royal Society. Retrieved 15 October 2009.
  4. ^ a b c Glassenberg AN, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Debruine LM, Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women, in Arch Sex Behav, vol. 39, n. 6, December 2010, pp. 1289–96, DOI:10.1007/s10508-009-9559-6.
  5. ^ a b c Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness, in Nature, vol. 394, n. 6696, 1998, pp. 884–7, DOI:10.1038/29772.
  6. ^ Lorenz, Kate. (2005). "Do Pretty People Earn More?" www.CNN.com.
  7. ^ Guy Dammann, Rules of attraction, The Guardian, 20 August 2008. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  8. ^ a b c SARAH KERSHAW, The Sum of Your Facial Parts, The New York Times, October 8, 2008. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011. Errore nelle note: Tag <ref> non valido; il nome "twsO52" è stato definito più volte con contenuti diversi
  9. ^ a b DAVID J. BERRI, Do Pretty-Boy Quarterbacks Make More Money?, The New York Times, September 16, 2008. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  10. ^ a b Edward Willett, A person's face can say a lot: Helen's face is said to have launched a thousand ships, while Medusa's could turn men to stone. And even today we talk about individuals with "a face that can stop a clock.", The Leader-Post (Regina), October 29, 2008. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  11. ^ a b Clare Murphy, In the eye of the beholder?, BBC News, 4 December 2003. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  12. ^ Oliver Burkeman, This column will change your life: The beauty in imperfection, The Guardian, 24 April 2010. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  13. ^ a b S McKeen, A beauty fix plumps up psyche and overall health, The Edmonton Journal, February 10, 2006. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  14. ^ Voon, C.P. The Crossroads of Race and Sexuality Date Selection Among Men in Internet “Personal” Ads. CUNY Graduate School.
  15. ^ Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes, in Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 266, n. 1431, September 1999, pp. 1913–7, DOI:10.1098/rspb.1999.0866.
  16. ^ Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 21, n. 1, January 2000, pp. 39–48, DOI:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1.
  17. ^ Rhodes G, The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty, in Annu Rev Psychol, vol. 57, 2006, pp. 199–226, DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
  18. ^ Fink B, Neave N, Seydel H, Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women, in Am J Hum Biol., vol. 19, n. 1, 2007, pp. 82–7, DOI:10.1002/ajhb.20583.
  19. ^ Rhodes G., Chan J., Zebrowitz L.A., Simmons L.W., Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?, in Proc Biol Sci., vol. 270, Suppl 1, 2003, pp. S93–5, DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0023.
  20. ^ Cellerino A, Psychobiology of facial attractiveness, in J Endocrinol Invest, vol. 26, 3 Suppl, 2003, pp. 45–8.
  21. ^ a b Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces, in Proc Biol Sci., vol. 268, n. 1462, 2001, pp. 39–44, DOI:10.1098/rspb.2000.1327.
  22. ^ Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 24, n. 4, July 2003, pp. 231–241, DOI:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00017-5.
  23. ^ http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013585
  24. ^ DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M. & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B 277, 2405–2410. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2184)
  25. ^ Looking Good: The Psychology and Biology of Beauty, in Stanford University, 6 dicembre 2002. URL consultato il 20 gennaio 2012.
  26. ^ a b Face shape clue to mental decline: Men with symmetrical faces are less likely to lose their memory and intelligence in later life, according to researchers., BBC News, 9 August 2009. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  27. ^ Tim Radford, How women dream of symmetrical men, in The Guardian, 17 August 2005. URL consultato il 19 gennaio 2010.
  28. ^ Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Comer R, Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry, in Animal Behaviour, vol. 50, n. 6, 1995, pp. 1601–15, DOI:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80014-X.
  29. ^ Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, et al., Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species, in PLoS ONE, vol. 3, n. 5, 2008, pp. e2106, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0002106.
  30. ^ Errore nelle note: Errore nell'uso del marcatore <ref>: non è stato indicato alcun testo per il marcatore tws19janbc
  31. ^ a b Nancy Etcoff, Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty, 2000, pp. 50–3, 185–7.
  32. ^ Haselton MG, Gangestad SW, Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle, in Horm Behav, vol. 49, n. 4, April 2006, pp. 509–18, DOI:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.10.006.
  33. ^ Rikowski A, Grammer K, Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness, in Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 266, n. 1422, May 1999, pp. 869–74, DOI:10.1098/rspb.1999.0717.
  34. ^ Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men, in Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 265, n. 1399, May 1998, pp. 927–33, DOI:10.1098/rspb.1998.0380.
  35. ^ The laws of sexual attraction, CNN, April 13, 2009. URL consultato il 25 luglio 2011.
  36. ^ a b Google Science Fair semi-finalist: I can taste your DNA, The Guardian, 25 luglio 2011. URL consultato il 25 luglio 2011.
  37. ^ a b Razib Khan in Genetics, Taking the pill might make your brother hawt?, Discover Magazine, August 16, 2008. URL consultato il 25 luglio 2011.
  38. ^ Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Perrett DI, Carter V, Jones BC, Penton-Voak I, Petrie M, MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 26, n. 3, May 2005, pp. 213–226, DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.09.002.
  39. ^ Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK, MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections, in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 99, n. 17, August 2002, pp. 11260–4, DOI:10.1073/pnas.162006499.
  40. ^ a b Williams, C. A. (1999). Roman homosexuality: ideologies of masculinity in classical antiquity. Oxford University Press, USA.
  41. ^ Horvath T, Physical attractiveness: the influence of selected torso parameters, in Arch Sex Behav, vol. 10, n. 1, February 1981, pp. 21–4, DOI:10.1007/BF01542671.
  42. ^ Swami V, Tovée MJ, The Muscular Male: A Comparison of the Physical Attractiveness Preferences of Gay and Heterosexual Men, in International Journal of Men's Health, vol. 7, n. 1, 2008, pp. 59–71, DOI:10.3149/jmh.0701.59.
  43. ^ Maggie Paley, The Book of the Penis, first, New York, Grove Press, 2000, pp. 232, 16–19, ISBN 0802116485.
  44. ^ Penis Size FAQ & Bibliography, su kinseyinstitute.org, Kinsey Institute, 2009.
  45. ^ Pierce, C.A. 1996; Cunningham, M.R. 1990; Pawlowski B, Dunbar RI, Lipowicz A 2000.
  46. ^ a b c David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, pp. 38–40, ISBN 0465077501.
  47. ^ a b c Sear R, Marlowe FW, How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate, in Biol. Lett., vol. 5, n. 5, October 2009, pp. 606–9, DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0342.
  48. ^ Tall men 'top husband stakes'. BBC News. Retrieved 15 October 2009.
  49. ^ Graziano W., T. Brothen and E. Berscheid. 1978. Height and attraction: Do men and women see eye-to-eye?, Journal of Personality, 46: 128-145
  50. ^ a b c Yee, N. (2002). Beyond Tops and Bottoms Correlations between Sex-Role Preference and Physical Preferences for Partners among Gay Men
  51. ^ Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Bishop PJ, Parish A, Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness in Men and Women: A New Zealand-U.S. Comparative Study, in Arch Sex Behav, vol. 39, n. 3, 2010, pp. 798–806, DOI:10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.
  52. ^ Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li B, Anderson MJ, Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China, in Am. J. Hum. Biol., vol. 19, n. 1, 2007, pp. 88–95, DOI:10.1002/ajhb.20584.
  53. ^ a b Dixson AF, Halliwell G, East R, Wignarajah P, Anderson MJ, Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women, in Arch Sex Behav, vol. 32, n. 1, February 2003, pp. 29–39, DOI:10.1023/A:1021889228469.
  54. ^ Rantala MJ, Pölkki M, Rantala LM, Preference for human male body hair changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause, in Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21, n. 2, 2010, pp. 419–423, DOI:10.1093/beheco/arp206.
  55. ^ Robins, A.H. (1991). Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge University Press
  56. ^ a b see Steve Sailer, Blondes Have Deeper Roots (2005)
  57. ^ a b Ian Stephen, Law Smith, M.J., Stirrat, M.R., Perrett, D.I., Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces, in International Journal of Primatology, vol. 30, n. 6, 2009, pp. 845–857, DOI:10.1007/s10764-009-9380-z.
  58. ^ a b Ian Stephen, Coetzee, V., Law Smith, M.J., Perrett, D.I., Skin blood perfusion and oxygenation affect perceived human health, in PLoS ONE, vol. 4, 2009, pp. e5083.
  59. ^ a b Ian Stephen, Coetzee, V., Perrett, D.I., Carotenoid and melanin pigment coloration affect perceived human health, in Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 32, 2011, pp. 216–227.
  60. ^ Ben Jones, Little, A.C., Burt, D.M., Perrett, D.I., When facial attractiveness is only skin deep, in Perception, vol. 33, 2004, pp. 569–576, DOI:10.1068/p3463.
  61. ^ a b c d e David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, pp. 51–4, ISBN 0465077501.
  62. ^ Browne KR, Sex, Power, and Dominance: The Evolutionary Psychology of Sexual Harassment, in Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 27, 2–3, 2006, pp. 145–158, DOI:10.1002/mde.1289.
  63. ^ a b IAN TATTERSALL (book reviewer) Geoffrey Miller (author), Whatever Turns You On: A psychologist looks at sexual attraction and what it means for humankind., The New York Times: Book Review, June 11, 2000. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  64. ^ Jackson, L. B. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. State University of New York Press.
  65. ^ a b c Fiona Macrae, Skin deep: Beautiful faces have Miss Average proportions, Daily Mail, 27 December 2009. URL consultato il 31 luglio 2011.
  66. ^ a b Berscheid and Reis, 1998
  67. ^ Fink B, Penton-Voak IS, Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness, in Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 11, n. 5, 2002, pp. 154–8, DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.00190.
  68. ^ Louann Brizendine, The female brain, Random House Digital, Inc., 2006, p. 63, ISBN 978-0-7679-2010-0.
  69. ^ Looking Good: The Psychology and Biology of Beauty, in Stanford University, 6 dicembre 2002. URL consultato il 20 gennaio 2012.
  70. ^ The Beautiful Face, in Columbia University, 2005.
  71. ^ a b c d Sharon Jayson, Study: Beautiful people cash in on their looks, USA Today, March 31, 2011. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  72. ^ How Big Is Your Limbal Ring? | Psychology Today
  73. ^ Jones, D. Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness and Facial Neoteny: Cross-Cultural Evidence and Implications. p.723
  74. ^ Kohl JV, The Mind's Eyes: Human Pheromones, Neuroscience, and Male Sexual Preferences, in Psychology & Human Sexuality, vol. 18, n. 4, 2006, pp. 313–369.
  75. ^ Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Grandi G, Binelli M, Ferrario VF, Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women, in Angle Orthod, vol. 79, n. 1, January 2009, pp. 17–23, DOI:10.2319/122707-605.1.
  76. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Cunningham MR, Roberts, AR, Barbee, AP, Druen, PB, Wu, CH, Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 68, n. 2, February 1995, pp. 261–279, DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261.
  77. ^ Cunningham MR, Measuring the Physical in Physical Attractiveness: Quasi-Experiments on the Sociobiology of Female Facial Beauty, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, n. 5, May 1986, pp. 925–935, DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925.
  78. ^ From Cunningham (1986) Research with Western subjects disclosed significant consistency in evaluating attractiveness (Hatfield & Sprecher, 1986; Iliife, 1960). The females judged to be most attractive may have such similar facial features that they were hard to distinguish one from another (Light, Hollander, & Kayra-Stuart, 1981). Cross-cultural investigations on the judgment of facial attractiveness tended to highlight societal differences, but rough agreements in facial aesthetic preferences were shown by Asian-American and Caucasian females (Wagatsuma & Kleinke, 1979), Chinese, Indian, and English females judging Greek males (Thakerar & Iwawaki, 1979), South African and American males and females (Morse, Gruzen, & Reis, 1976), and blacks and whites judging males and females from both races (Cross & Cross, 1971).
  79. ^ David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, pp. 54, 55, ISBN 0465077501.
  80. ^ Berger, M. (1999). White lies: race and the myths of whiteness. Farrar, Strous and Giroux, Canada.
  81. ^ a b c John Tierney, The Waif From Ipanema, in New York Times, January 18, 2007. URL consultato il 6 novembre 2009. Errore nelle note: Tag <ref> non valido; il nome "tws6nov09" è stato definito più volte con contenuti diversi
  82. ^ Perfect face dimensions measured, in BBC News, 18 dicembre 2009. URL consultato il 22 maggio 2010.
  83. ^ Hechter, M. (2011). Social Norms. Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 300
  84. ^ Biello D, What is the Best Age Difference for Husband and Wife?, su scientificamerican.com, Scientific American, 5 December 2007.
  85. ^ Young JA, Critelli JW, Keith KW, Male age preferences for short-term and long-term mating, in Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, vol. 7, n. 2, 2005, pp. 83–93, DOI:10.1080/14616660500035090.
  86. ^ Quinsey, V.L. The Etiology of Anomalous Sexual Preferences in Men. Queen's University Department of Psychology.
  87. ^ Scientific proof that men look at women's breasts first and their face is almost last The Daily Telegraph
  88. ^ Joann Ellison Rodgers, Sex: A Natural History, Macmillan, 2003, p. 102, ISBN 978-0-8050-7281-5.
  89. ^ Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective in Evolutionary Psychology Handbook, Lawrence S. Sugiyama (2005).
  90. ^ Buss, David M.The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pg. 325 ISBN 0-471-26403-2, 9780471264033
  91. ^ a b c Furnham A, Swami V, Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile, in Soc Behav Pers, vol. 35, n. 1, 2007, pp. 1–8, DOI:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.1. Errore nelle note: Tag <ref> non valido; il nome "Furnham" è stato definito più volte con contenuti diversi
  92. ^ Hourglass figure fertility link - BBC News
  93. ^ DOI: 10.3390/sym2021081
  94. ^ Fisher, H.B. (1982). The Sex Contract - The Evolution of Human Behavior. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc.
  95. ^ a b Caro, T.M. & D. W. Sellen, D.W. (1990). The Reproductive Advantages of Fat in Women. Ethology and Sociobiology. (11)5 1-66 0162-3095
  96. ^ Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL, Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness, in Lancet, vol. 352, n. 9127, August 1998, p. 548, DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79257-6.
  97. ^ a b c David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, pp. 55, 56, ISBN 0465077501.
  98. ^ DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.013
  99. ^ Nanci Hellmich, Do thin models warp girls' body image?, USA TODAY, 26 settembre 2006. URL consultato il 6 novembre 2009.
  100. ^ M.L. Fisher, Voracek M., The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness, in J Cosmet Dermatol, vol. 5, n. 2, June 2006, pp. 190–4, DOI:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x.
  101. ^ B.J. Dixson, Dixson A.F., Li B., Anderson M.J., Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China, in Am J Hum Biol, vol. 19, n. 1, January 2007, pp. 88–95, DOI:10.1002/ajhb.20584.
  102. ^ F. Marlowe, Wetsman, A., Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology (PDF), in Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 30, n. 3, 2001, pp. 481–489, DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00039-8. URL consultato il 4 agosto 2007.
  103. ^ Marlowe F, Apicella C, Reed D, Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 26, n. 6, November 2005, pp. 458–468, DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005. as PDF
  104. ^ B.J. Dixson, Dixson A.F., Morgan B., Anderson M.J., Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon, in Arch Sex Behav, vol. 36, n. 3, June 2007, pp. 369–75, DOI:10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8.
  105. ^ R.E. Freedman, Carter M.M., Sbrocco T., Gray JJ., Do men hold African-American and Caucasian women to different standards of beauty?, in Eat Behav, vol. 8, n. 3, August 2007, pp. 319–33, DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.11.008.
  106. ^ R.E. Freedman, Carter M.M., Sbrocco T., Gray J.J., Ethnic differences in preferences for female weight and waist-to-hip ratio: a comparison of African-American and White American college and community samples, in Eat Behav., vol. 5, n. 3, July 2004, pp. 191–8, DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.01.002.
  107. ^ Yu DW, Shepard GH, Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?, in Nature, vol. 396, n. 6709, November 1998, pp. 321–2, DOI:10.1038/24512.
  108. ^ David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, p. 56, ISBN 0465077501.
  109. ^ http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/daniel.nettle/procroysoc.pdf
  110. ^ a b c Scar, R. Height and Reproductive Success: How a Gambian Population Compares to the West. Human Nature Winter 2006.
  111. ^ BBC News: "Tall men 'top husband stakesTemplate:'"
  112. ^ Sorokowskia P, Pawlowskib B, Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 29, n. 2, March 2008, pp. 86–91, DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.09.002.
  113. ^ Sorokowski P, Attractiveness of Legs Length in Poland and Great Britain (PDF), in J Hum Ecol, vol. 31, n. 3, 2010, p. 148.
  114. ^ a b c d Bertamini M, Bennet KM, The effect of leg length on perceived attractiveness of simplified stimuli (PDF), in Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, vol. 3, n. 3, 2009, pp. 233–250.
  115. ^ Frederick DA, Hadji-Michael M, Furnham A, Swami V, The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR, in Body Image, vol. 7, n. 1, January 2010, pp. 51–5, DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.09.001.
  116. ^ a b Swami V, Einon D, Furnham A, The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion, in Body Image, vol. 3, n. 4, December 2006, pp. 317–23, DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.003.
  117. ^ Barber N, The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology, in Ethology & Sociobiology, vol. 19, n. 5, September 1995, pp. 395–424, DOI:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2.
  118. ^ Voracek M, Fisher ML, Rupp B, Lucas D, Fessler DM, Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings, in Percept Mot Skills, vol. 104, 3 Pt 2, June 2007, pp. 1123–38.
  119. ^ Berman, J.E. (1993). Female Genital Mutilation, Yes, but Don't Condone It. Accessed date November 6, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/30/opinion/l-understand-female-genital-mutilation-yes-but-don-t-condone-it-015393.html
  120. ^ David M. Buss, The handbook of evolutionary psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 2005, p. 309, ISBN 978-0-471-26403-3.
  121. ^ a b c Bereczkei, T. Hair length, facial attractiveness, personality attribution; A multiple fitness model of hairdressing
  122. ^ a b The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by David M. Buss, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. Chapter 10 "Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective" by Lawrence S. Sugiyama.
  123. ^ a b Peter Frost "Fair Women, Dark Men: The Forgotten Roots of Color Prejudice," (2005).
  124. ^ a b Dixson, Barnaby. Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness: Sexual Preferences of Men and Women in Bakossiland, Cameroon http://www.springerlink.com/content/b74147t360040220/fulltext.pdf
  125. ^ The Heavy Cost of Light Skin, in BBC News, 18 aprile 2000. URL consultato il 09-08-2010.
  126. ^ What Are "Good Looks"?, su northbysouth.kenyon.edu, Kenyon College. URL consultato il 09-08-2010.
  127. ^ Vanessa E. Jones, Pride or Prejudice?, Boston.com, 19 agosto 2004. URL consultato il 09-08-2010.
  128. ^ Skin whitening big business in Asia | PRI.ORG
  129. ^ Merrill Singer, Hans Beyer, Killer Commodities: Public Health and the Corporate Production of Harm, AltaMira Press, 28 July 2008, p. 151, ISBN 0759109796.
    «Harris investigated the history of the parasol... everywhere ordinary people were forbidden to protect themselves with such devices "pallid skin became a marker of upper-class status". At the beginning of the 20th Century, in the United States, lighter-skinned people avoided the sun... Tanned skin was considered lower class.»
  130. ^ Use of Sunscreen, Sunburning Rates, and Tanning Bed Use Among More Than 10 000 US Children and Adolescents, in Pediatrics, vol. 109, n. 6, 6 giugno 2002, pp. 1009–14, DOI:10.1542/peds.109.6.1009.
  131. ^ Broadstock M, Borland R, Gason R, Effects of Suntan on Judgements of Healthiness and Attractiveness by Adolescents, in J Appl Soc Psychol, vol. 22, n. 2, January 1992, pp. 157–172, DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01527.x.
  132. ^ Leary MR, Jones JL, The Social Psychology of Tanning and Sunscreen Use: Self-Presentational Motives as a Predictor of Health Risk, in J Appl Soc Psychol, vol. 23, n. 17, September 1993, pp. 1390–1406, DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01039.x.
  133. ^ Tan is 'In': Study Finds Light Brown More Attractive than Pale or Dark Skin
  134. ^ Fink B., Grammer K., Thornhill R., Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color, in Journal of Comparative Psychology, vol. 115, n. 1, 2001, pp. 92–99.
  135. ^ Fink, B. & Matts, P.J. (2008). The effects of skin colour distribution and topography cues on the perception of female facial age and health. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology, 22(4), 493-498.
  136. ^ JOHN TIERNEY, The Threatening Scent of Fertile Women, The New York Times, February 21, 2011. URL consultato il 15 luglio 2011.
  137. ^ Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M, Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review, in Psychol Bull, vol. 126, n. 3, May 2000, pp. 390–423, DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390. as PDF
  138. ^ PMID 6008393
  139. ^ Cowley, Geoffrey. "The Biology of beauty". Newsweek. June 3, 1996
  140. ^ a b David Buss, The Evolution of Desire, second, New York, Basic Books, 2003, pp. 57, 58, 60–63, ISBN 0465077501.
  141. ^ DOI: 10.1007/BF00287245
  142. ^ DOI: 10.1007/BF00287468
  143. ^ Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether,and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.
  144. ^ Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?, By Eastwick, Paul W.; Finkel, Eli J. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 94(2), Feb 2008, 245-264, Norman P. Lia, , , Katherine A. Valentinea and Lily Patel
  145. ^ Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model, Personality and Individual Differences Volume 50, Issue 2, January 2011, Pages 291-294
  146. ^ Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.981
  147. ^ Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity, Eastwick, Paul W.; Eagly, Alice H.; Finkel, Eli J.; Johnson, Sarah E. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Jul 18, 2011
  148. ^ DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0325-7
  149. ^ DOI: 10.1556/JEP.2008.1001
  150. ^ DOI: 10.1348/000712609X417319
  151. ^ DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005
  152. ^ Symons D. 1995. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture: Chicago Series on Sexuality, History, and Society, ed. P.R. Abramson, S.D. Pinkerton, pp. 80–119. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  153. ^ Sex Differences: Developmental and Evolutionary Strategies by Linda Mealey and Mother Nature by Sarah Hardy.
  154. ^ a b Abigail Trafford, Andrew Cherlin, Second Opinion: Men's Health & Marriage, in Washington Post, March 6, 2001. URL consultato il 6 novembre 2009.
  155. ^ Women drawn to men with muscles
  156. ^ DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004
  157. ^ Women's choice of men goes in cycles
  158. ^ How Ladies Size Up Facial Attractiveness
  159. ^ Study on differences in Male, Female sexuality. June 2003
  160. ^ Federally funded study measures arousal
  161. ^ New York Times. "What do women want?" Study on human sexuality
  162. ^ ScienceDaily. "Study Suggests Difference Between Female And Male Sexuality"[1]
  163. ^ Women's choice of men goes in cycles, in BBC News, 24 giugno 1999. URL consultato il 30 November 2006.
  164. ^ The Selfish Gene
  165. ^ University of Michigan.
  166. ^ DOI: 10.1177/0146167207303022
  167. ^ (Locke & Horowitz, 1990).
  168. ^ DeBruine LM, Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women, in Evol Hum Behav, vol. 25, n. 3, May 2004, pp. 142–154, DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.003.
  169. ^ Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance, in Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, vol. 272, n. 1566, 2005, pp. 919–922, DOI:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003.
  170. ^ Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates, in Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, vol. 277, n. 1691, 2010, pp. 2175–2183, DOI:10.1098/rspb.2010.0258.
  171. ^ a b Cash TF, Gillen B, Burns DS, Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making, in Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 62, n. 3, June 1977, pp. 301–310, DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.301.
  172. ^ a b Clark, M.S.; & Mills, J. (1979)
  173. ^ Jonathan E. Berman (letter to the editor), Understand Female Genital Mutilation, Yes, but Don't Condone It, in New York Times, November 30, 1993. URL consultato il 6 novembre 2009.
  174. ^ Gary Lewandowski, Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite-sex physical attractiveness, in Personal Relationships, vol. 14, n. 4, 2007, pp. 571–585, DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00172.x.
  175. ^ http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/Careers/07/08/looks/ Do Pretty People Earn More from cnn.com
  176. ^ Daniel Goleman, A Rising Cost Of Modernity: Depression, in New York Times, December 8, 1992. URL consultato il 6 novembre 2009.
  177. ^ De Santis, A; and Kayson, W.A. 1999
  178. ^ Science rewrites the rules of attraction
  179. ^ Cowley, Geoffrey. "The Biology of beauty." Newsweek. June 3, 1996
  180. ^ Sexual atrractiveness predicted by voice attractiveness
  181. ^ Gillian Rhodes, Zebrowitz, Leslie, A., Facial Attractiveness – Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives, Ablex, 2002, ISBN 1567506364.
  182. ^ Edler RJ, Background considerations to facial aesthetics, in J Orthod, vol. 28, n. 2, June 2001, pp. 159–68, DOI:10.1093/ortho/28.2.159.
  183. ^ Zaidel DW, Aarde SM, Baig K, Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces, in Brain Cogn, vol. 57, n. 3, April 2005, pp. 261–3, DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.056.
  184. ^ Evolution producing more 'beautiful' women

Template:Aesthetics Template:Human sexuality

Estratto da "https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Attrattività_fisica&oldid=47931963"