Discussioni utente:Kobiwankinobi
Vai alla navigazione
Vai alla ricerca
Ciao Kobiwankinobi, un benvenuto su Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia a contenuto libero!
Per iniziare la tua collaborazione, ricorda quali sono i cinque pilastri di Wikipedia, dai un'occhiata alla guida essenziale o alla pagina di aiuto e soprattutto impara cosa mettere e cosa non mettere su Wikipedia. Ricorda che:
- non è consentito inserire materiale protetto da copyright. Se desideri inserire un tuo testo già pubblicato altrove, inviaci prima una comunicazione nel modo indicato qui. Se invece desideri caricare un'immagine leggi prima la pagina Wikipedia:Copyright immagini.
- le voci devono essere in lingua italiana e rispettare un punto di vista neutrale.
Per qualsiasi problema puoi chiedere: allo sportello Informazioni, a un amministratore, in chat wikipedia-it o a un qualsiasi utente che vedi collegato consultando le ultime modifiche.
Per firmare i tuoi interventi nelle pagine di discussione usa il tasto che vedi indicato nell'immagine a destra e consulta la pagina Aiuto:Uso della firma.
Buon lavoro e buon divertimento da parte di tutti i wikipediani!
Naturalmente un benvenuto anche da parte mia! Se avessi bisogno di qualcosa non esitare a contattarmi. ripe (domande?) 15:48, 8 feb 2009 (CET)
| it-0 | Questo utente non è in grado di comunicare in italiano (o lo capisce solo con notevole difficoltà). |
|---|
--Kobiwankinobi (msg) 16:09, 8 feb 2009 (CET)
- Bitte um Hilfe wegen dem Link [www.rothenburg-tourist.de/it/index.htm], möchte den genannten Link auf die Rothenburg ob der Tauber Seite verlinken. Meine Seite enthält wesentlich mehr Informationen wie sie bei wikipedia erscheinen beziehungsweise nicht erscheinen dürfen. Habe unterdessen die Daten im Bereich Geschichte erweitert. Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 16:12, 8 feb 2009 (CET)
Re:[modifica wikitesto]
Hello, I deleted your text because it wasn't written in Italian. Anyway, I moved here your new text, since it needs to be carefully verified. --Al Pereira (msg) 01:41, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Hi, somehow its isn´t there. --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 10:58, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
No violations of copyright[modifica wikitesto]
Please don't copy-paste anything but what is clearly and expressely indicated as free content --Stonehead (msg) 02:20, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Ok, I already linked the www.rothenburg-tourist.de for some month ago in the German and English version of Rothenburg ob der Tauber in Wikipedia. So, the long-time contributor check them all, because the informations in www.rothenburg-tourist.de are relevant. Now, the Italian Version is just a translation of it. Also I put further historical informations all of them Versions in Wikipedia, cause I am an "expert" about the city of Rothenburg ob der Tauber and(!) I am the owner of it!. Lot of italians come to Rothenburg in the reality. Please help to give them more Informations, because they want to. I hope you understand want I am telling you. Thanks for help! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 11:00, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Our interest is indeed in having any and every article as complete as possible. However we need reliable sources and references for any and every article, and for external links too. No doubt your site comes from deep studies, and no doubt it is a reliable work, but due to the policies we use here, we need some references. If you can indicate which works you based your study upon, we will be glad to enrich the article with that. Otherwise we will try to find sources and references, but this will be made by those users who know better the subject. Your edit were found during ordinary random check, I am not an expert in this field. However, thank you for your contribution --Stonehead (msg) 11:09, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Thanks for answer. My sources are the historical city archive of Rothenburg and the book [Die Geschichte der Stadt Rothenburg ob der Tauber, http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/3799571175?ie=UTF8&tag=rothenburgtou-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1638&creative=6742&creativeASIN=3799571175]. The informations in this book are in German. I give my studies an agency to translate in english and some day´s ago in italien. But not 1 to 1! This is my work and my studies. My interests are, to give the wikipedia user correct and more informations about the history of Rothenburg. See, this City have an old story, thats why we have to give them this informations. I live here and I am the owner of the internetsite www.rothenburg-tourist.de. What can I do more than to telling you thats my work? Till now nobody criticized my work on my internetsite, even blocked. At least put my link as an external link to the wikipedia article. I think the informations are relevant, see the links in german and english version of wikipedia. Thanks for help. Lets make a better world! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 11:58, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- As I said, I have no doubts about the seriousness of your work, so it is not at all a matter of criticism, it is, instead, a matter of policies in this version of Wikipedia. We have two points to consider: sources and license. Given that you are the owner of the website, the easiest an quickest way to include your work into the article is to add to the page - if you agree and if it is possible - the sources (just like you indicated them to me above) and to license that page in public domain or in GFDL - GNU Free Documentation License (linking to this license). In this case, I would immediately re-include the text in the article, as soon as I check that the page in your site cites the sources and is released as free content. The page would then obviously be linked as the origin of the text, and if you license it in GFDL, the attribution of that text will be perennial, no matter about eventual later modifications. Not all of your website needs to be licensed as free content, only that page (precisely, only the text we are talking about, not the layout, not the templates, not anything else but that text). If this can be done, I will very gladly help in putting it back into the article, so please let me know if we can. Thanks in advance --Stonehead (msg) 12:38, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Hi Stonehead, please check out the Site witch the informations we talking about it: [1]. Go down till you see the GNU. Is it possible to put my link as an "external link" for "further informations" or "tourist informations" like the english and the german versions too? Thanks for your help! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 14:29, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- And, by the way, the name of my new little company is "kopfstein" that means translate in english "headstone" and the funny thing is, on the entry site of www.kopfstein-media.de is a Stonehead. He says the words of Socrate "Communicate, so I can see you.". ;-) Lets make the world better! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 15:38, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Thank you very much, indeed, I am starting now to make a few little changes to put it into wikipedian markup and style (just a rewording). Your site will now be cited and linked as a source, which I believe is also something more than a simple ordinary link :-)
- So, Socrates had already foreseen we were meant to meet, some day or the other, and I am very pleased it happened :-) Thank you very much, you made Wikipedia richer, for the advantage of everybody :-))) --Stonehead (msg) 16:02, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- To say thank you, is´t on my site. Thanks much for your patience, and lets break the border down to be a world of union, at this hard times for everyone. "yes we can" I hope you agree :-)--Kobiwankinobi (msg) 18:27, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- As I said, I have no doubts about the seriousness of your work, so it is not at all a matter of criticism, it is, instead, a matter of policies in this version of Wikipedia. We have two points to consider: sources and license. Given that you are the owner of the website, the easiest an quickest way to include your work into the article is to add to the page - if you agree and if it is possible - the sources (just like you indicated them to me above) and to license that page in public domain or in GFDL - GNU Free Documentation License (linking to this license). In this case, I would immediately re-include the text in the article, as soon as I check that the page in your site cites the sources and is released as free content. The page would then obviously be linked as the origin of the text, and if you license it in GFDL, the attribution of that text will be perennial, no matter about eventual later modifications. Not all of your website needs to be licensed as free content, only that page (precisely, only the text we are talking about, not the layout, not the templates, not anything else but that text). If this can be done, I will very gladly help in putting it back into the article, so please let me know if we can. Thanks in advance --Stonehead (msg) 12:38, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Thanks for answer. My sources are the historical city archive of Rothenburg and the book [Die Geschichte der Stadt Rothenburg ob der Tauber, http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/3799571175?ie=UTF8&tag=rothenburgtou-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1638&creative=6742&creativeASIN=3799571175]. The informations in this book are in German. I give my studies an agency to translate in english and some day´s ago in italien. But not 1 to 1! This is my work and my studies. My interests are, to give the wikipedia user correct and more informations about the history of Rothenburg. See, this City have an old story, thats why we have to give them this informations. I live here and I am the owner of the internetsite www.rothenburg-tourist.de. What can I do more than to telling you thats my work? Till now nobody criticized my work on my internetsite, even blocked. At least put my link as an external link to the wikipedia article. I think the informations are relevant, see the links in german and english version of wikipedia. Thanks for help. Lets make a better world! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 11:58, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Our interest is indeed in having any and every article as complete as possible. However we need reliable sources and references for any and every article, and for external links too. No doubt your site comes from deep studies, and no doubt it is a reliable work, but due to the policies we use here, we need some references. If you can indicate which works you based your study upon, we will be glad to enrich the article with that. Otherwise we will try to find sources and references, but this will be made by those users who know better the subject. Your edit were found during ordinary random check, I am not an expert in this field. However, thank you for your contribution --Stonehead (msg) 11:09, 9 feb 2009 (CET)
- Ok, I already linked the www.rothenburg-tourist.de for some month ago in the German and English version of Rothenburg ob der Tauber in Wikipedia. So, the long-time contributor check them all, because the informations in www.rothenburg-tourist.de are relevant. Now, the Italian Version is just a translation of it. Also I put further historical informations all of them Versions in Wikipedia, cause I am an "expert" about the city of Rothenburg ob der Tauber and(!) I am the owner of it!. Lot of italians come to Rothenburg in the reality. Please help to give them more Informations, because they want to. I hope you understand want I am telling you. Thanks for help! --Kobiwankinobi (msg) 11:00, 9 feb 2009 (CET)