Utente:Maxcip/Babel
Qui mi organizzerò per le traduzioni..
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_%28graph_theory%29
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cladistics
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clade
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venom_clade
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolution -->cronologia -->http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scala_dei_tempi_geologici
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image%3AStoriaDieta.png
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image%3ALevallois_Preferencial-Animation.gif
sul flauto http://www.greenwych.ca/fl-compl.htm inoltre, citare a proposito della cultura litica: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ANTHROPOLOGY: Paul Mellars, Brad Gravina, and Christopher Bronk Ramsey Confirmation of Neanderthal/modern human interstratification at the Chatelperronian type-site PNAS 2007 104: 3657-3662; published online before print as 10.1073/pnas.0608053104
- ......This interpretation has recently been challenged by Zilhao and colleagues [Zilhao J, d'Errico F, Bordes J-G, Lenoble A, Texier J-P...first in a paper presented by Francesco d'Errico, Joao Zilhao, and two colleagues to the Annual Meeting of the......
The nature of the replacement of Neanderthal by anatomically and behaviorally modern populations in Europe is currently a topic of lively debate in human evolution. In an earlier paper [Gravina B, Mellars P, Bronk Ramsey C (2005) Nature 483:51–56], we published a series of radiocarbon accelerator mass spectrometer measurements for the site of Châtelperron in central France, which had been claimed to show a clear "interstratification" of successive levels of Neanderthal and modern human occupation, on the basis of excavations carried out by Henri Delporte in the 1950s. This interpretation has recently been challenged by Zilhão and colleagues [Zilhão J, d'Errico F, Bordes J-G, Lenoble A, Texier J-P, Rigaud J-P (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12643–12648], who suggest that the deposits excavated in the 1950s consisted largely, if not entirely, of the unstratified "backdirt" of the earlier, 19th century excavations on the site. We show here that the excavation backdirt interpretation for the Châtelperron stratigraphy can be refuted from many different aspects of the stratigraphic, radiocarbon, and archaeological evidence. We reassess the significance of this site for current models of the coexistence and interactions between Neanderthal and anatomically modern populations in western Europe.
archaeology | Paleolithic | human evolution | France
Author contributions: B.G. and C.B.R. analyzed data; and P.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS direct submission.
§ d'Errico, F., Bordes, J.-G., Lenoble, A., Zilhão, J., Annual Meeting of the Palaeoanthropology Society, Puerto Rico, April 2006, p. A95.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0608053104/DC1.
{dagger}To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail pam59{at}cam.ac.uk
© 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA