Discussione:Religione di Stato

gentile rosario ferrara,

thank you for contacting us.

wikimedia foundation respects the editorial independence and autonomy of wikipedia's online community, the sole collective owner of the articles and the one and only subject allowed to decide everything about them. that community is open and you can join it and bring your contribution to knowledge together with all the other users.

you can open a discussion in the article's talk page here https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussione:Religione_di_Stato&action=edit here you can add your sourced point of view and when a sufficient consensus will be reached among editors, the article is there to be brought to a more informative condition.

we look forward to watching this article grow in quality with your help, too.

greetings

op000187 ps: please don't write on wikipedia in "all caps" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_caps it wouldn't be coherent with the site's habits.

-- wikipedia - https://it.wikipedia.org/ attenzione: i messaggi provenienti da questo indirizzo sono compilati da operatori volontari e non sono da considerarsi come dichiarazioni ufficiali della wikimedia foundation. per corrispondere con la wikimedia foundation, fate riferimento al sito ufficiale, all'indirizzo <https://www.wikimediafoundation.org/>.

21/03/2020 23:28 - rosario ferrara ha scritto:

please correct: - the catholicity is not the “religione di stato” of the vatican city state… the vatican city state is a sovereign territorial entity given to the roman pontif by the kingdom of italy to permit him to administrate his affairs as the head of the catholic church… so, the vatican city state is posed under to the roman pontif, but with a “fundamental law” that doesn’t coincide with the “codex ivris canonici”… in no article of the “fundamental law” there is an official declaration of the catholicity of the state, basically supposing what follows: 1st: the territory was yet catholic under the papal state. 2nd: the territory was officially catholic under the kingdom of italy, even if the kingdom of italy was born as an anti-catholic state. 3rd: so, for both, the catholicity of the state was supposed as in continuity. 4th: but the presence of an un-confessional “fundamental law” can be meant in another way, which is “two powers, two entities”… under the same roman pontif, the catholic church for the religious affairs, and the lay vatican city state for the ordinary administration of “temporal” affairs. — so, the matter isn’t easy to be clarified, but needs to be! cheers, ferrara don rosario— Questo commento senza la firma utente è stato inserito da 79.12.127.157 (discussioni · contributi) 15:32, 22 mar 2020‎ (CET).

Tiridate III di Armenia e san Gregorio Illuminatore

La voce di Tiridate III di Armenia già fontava il riconoscimento del Cristianesimo come religione di Stato dell'Armenia. Tale fatto si verificò nel 301 e dunque l'editto di Teodosio non rappresentò il primo caso storico di riconoscimento della libertà di culto, diversamente da quanto qui si affermava.

La fonte citata aggiunge che il re armeno quasi si mosse al di là della propria confessione personale, fatto che accenna ad un patto politico-religioso con san Gregorio illuminatore. Saluti, Micheledisaverio