Discussioni utente:Simbass

Repubblica

Hi! You need sources, not "facts". --pequod ^..Ħƕ 22:47, 25 mar 2013 (CET)

What I see is that you have removed a sentence about the greek poleis (here) and that Vituzzu has reverted your edit. Again, I think that we need sources about the issue. --pequod ^..Ħƕ 23:05, 25 mar 2013 (CET)

Maybe you don't know the exact rule of the sources in Wikipedia... Maybe you don't care, I can't say. But this is where it's at: sources, not mere "facts". Speaking of "direct democracy" about ancient Athens is quite an abuse or just a simile: women were represented by men? As long as we go on with this chat, ignoring the rule of the sources, we transform WP in a forum, which is not fair. Goodbye. --pequod ^..Ħƕ 00:21, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

I'm sorry, I am not enough expert to say anything about that statement without the support of a source. There are a few experts to whom we can ask, so they can provide sources about direct democracy (not greek democracy). --pequod ^..Ħƕ 00:40, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

progetto:storia antica: it's a wikiproject. You might signal the thread to progetto:politica. Goodnight! :) --pequod ^..Ħƕ 00:54, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Re:

I'm simply waiting for the result of this SPI. --Vito (msg) 23:11, 25 mar 2013 (CET)

It means you're abusing of four accounts, it means you tried to fool me when you pretended to be able to speak Italian and it means your accounts should be globally locked. --Vito (msg) 23:56, 25 mar 2013 (CET)

You have also a fourth account. --Vito (msg) 00:10, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Are you sure? --Vito (msg) 00:24, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Seriously I don't like to be fooled, can you give me just a reason to avoid locking your accont here too or even globally? --Vito (msg) 00:59, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

I see you're going on trying fooling, the main problem is your FOURTH account I already blocked here. --Vito (msg) 01:14, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

So it's not you, is it? --Vito (msg) 01:26, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

You don't care but I care so much since you're evading this block and you have been trying fooling us for months. --Vito (msg) 01:37, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

According to our policy a block evasion is not the end of the World but simply the end of your account. --Vito (msg) 02:02, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Not really, or are you pretending to know it.wiki's policies as good as you did with Italian? Actually you're having the same behaviour which did bring you to block: you decide something in a language you don't know is surely wrong, you decide your opinion is an absolute form of consensus and you decided removing the supposed mistake is an aim worth ignoring any rule. That's not wiki, at all. --Vito (msg) 02:11, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

...you decide something in a language you don't know is surely wrong, you decide your opinion is an absolute form of consensus and you decided removing the supposed mistake is an aim worth ignoring any rule...--Vito (msg) 02:21, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

I'm seriously thinking you're trolling me. I'm dealing with the way you're acting, what are you trying to do it's another issue. --Vito (msg) 02:39, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Some months ago you started editing a page using a crappy Italian, since you went on doing it I blocked you. Then you contacted me on en.wiki going on pretending to be an IT-N, finally I stopped replying to your trolling since I understood it was useless. Today I found a block evasion from you, after a quick investigation en.wiki's checkusers also found you were abusing multiple accounts. Wikipedia is based upon consensus, you're simply stating the sentence you want to remove is absolutely wrong and nothing else does matter: trolling, edit-warring, block evasions, sockpuppeting, nothing just your idea you're absolutely right. Seriously I took some minutes to talk to you in order to understand how far is your attitude from collaborative work and you failed to show me any ability to take part to a collaborative project. --Vito (msg) 03:12, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Since you're blocked you are no longer allowed to editing here, it's so simple, isn't it? --Vito (msg) 03:23, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

My answer is just a line above. --Vito (msg) 03:28, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

But as already said it's you who does say that sentence is absolutely wrong. You do not take in consideration people may disagree with you, it's the same problematic behaviour you had when I blocked your first account. Since you're clearly not enough comfortable with collaborative editing please respect the locks you're about to get, otherwise your edits will be reverted on sight. --Vito (msg) 03:35, 26 mar 2013 (CET)

Everything you edit turn into an edit-war, it happened on en.wiki, es.wiki, an.wiki and it.wiki, it's clearly your fault and honestly the way you're going on saying "I'm right nothing else matters" it's quietly ridiculous. I've decided to lock all your accounts for an indefinite length of time, I will also globally block the IP addresses you're using, I will fill a report for patrollers in order to prevent you from editing Wikipedia until you'll get enough wise to take part to a collaborative project. --Vito (msg) 03:47, 26 mar 2013 (CET)