Discussioni utente:Billinghurst

Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

La pagina di riferimento si trova in un altro sito/progetto:
#REDIRECTm:user talk:billinghurst
Unfortunately I don't speak Italian. :-/ Billinghurst (msg) 00:32, 26 gen 2010 (CET)

Hi[modifica wikitesto]

this site * Servizio gratuito di assistenza alle vittime del Cyber Bullismo offer a specific free service to help family. THIS IS A VALUE!

D
While that is certainly helpful to those who need it, I am not sure how that is relevant to Italian wikipedia (which is an encyclopaedia). This site is not a directory listing. Billinghurst (msg) 15:56, 14 ago 2013 (CEST)

Buongiorno Abito alla Sforzesca e pur essendo un centro ricco d'arte e storia, esso latita per presenza turistica. La galleria fotografica realizzata da un fotografo professionale, arricchisce la pagina di wikipedia di un contenuto iconografico che prima non aveva e contribuisce a destare l'interesse per la nostra frazione. Il link alla photo gallery che ho aggiunto peraltro non contiene alcun riferimento a nomi personali o aziendali. Spero di aver contribuito a spiegare il senso di questa aggiunta Mario Tabata

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, it is not a list of links to sites. We tend not to have links to photographic galleries. Billinghurst (msg) 10:34, 10 gen 2015 (CET)

Complain[modifica wikitesto]

If you don't understand Italian that's not your fault, but if you try to apply change to an Italian Wikipedia page you can do damages galore. So please stop doing that or if you can't resist, let some of your italian-speaking fellows translate contents and messages sent to you before acting in this way Thanks a lot for your attention

I do not need to speak Italian to identify and revert a post that is out of scope. Translation tools also enable the review of an edit. Please read the editing guidance about what is acceptable in terms of collegamenti esterni. Billinghurst (msg) 11:47, 16 gen 2015 (CET)

Template:Link V[modifica wikitesto]

Hello. This template (and Template:Link VdQ) are still useful here for a service categorization, I don't understand why is so important for you (and the other ones that wrote here and here) that they are deleted. Anyhow, please, don't ask for a speedy-deletion if the request does not conform to our criteria. --Horcrux九十二 01:23, 3 apr 2015 (CEST)

[@ Horcrux92] Then why not just keep the categorisation, and leave the display aspects to WD. That said it is my understanding that you can still maintain the categorisation (eg. w:en:Category:Featured_articles) using WD through other means. The purpose of Wikidata is to remove all these manual aspects of "make work". Billinghurst (msg) 01:58, 3 apr 2015 (CEST)
Here we are discussing about using a template like fr:Modèle:Catégorisation badges. There is no hurry... --Horcrux九十二 02:00, 3 apr 2015 (CEST)
Sure, not challenging your process, was more pointing to something with regard to the reasoning. 02:15, 3 apr 2015 (CEST)


Renault 9 e Renault 11[modifica wikitesto]

Renault 9 ​​e Renault 11 sono gli stessi modelli . Ci vuole un solo articolo , come nella Wikipedia in francese , inglese , spagnolo , ... Guarda in altre lingue , vi è un solo articolo per i 2 modelli

francese: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_9_et_11

inglese: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_9_%26_11

spagnolo: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_9/11


DarkPrinz (msg)

Poche ore rimaste per votare[modifica wikitesto]

Ciao, ho visto che non hai ancora votato e ti segnalo che sono rimaste poche ore per votare alle elezioni FDC (informazioni): c'è tempo fino alla mezzanotte. È importante votare perché hanno partecipato pochi utenti della Wikipedia in italiano e gli eletti andranno a controllare la distribuzione, fra l'altro, delle donazioni effettuate da italiani vedendo i banner nella Wikipedia in italiano (oltre un milione di dollari l'anno). Nemo (msg) 14:14, 10 mag 2015 (CEST)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[modifica wikitesto]

Wikimedia Italia-logo.svg
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 13:12, 26 apr 2016 (CEST)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[modifica wikitesto]

Wikimedia Italia-logo.svg
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 13:13, 26 apr 2016 (CEST)

Re: tigermask.sakura.ne.jp[modifica wikitesto]

Hi, I've removed the domain from every article. The IP is Inufan, a blocked user who is already known for stalking and for his taste for original research (see WP:Utenti problematici/Inufan). Thank you for the report.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 16:16, 18 nov 2017 (CET)

Thanks Sakretsu. I will bump up COIBot's attention to the domain; and I have added it to XLinkBot's revertlist at enWP. It is not sufficiently widespread for me to think that it should be globally blacklisted, and when the sites have not done so. Billinghurst (msg) 03:53, 19 nov 2017 (CET)

Cesa 1882[modifica wikitesto]

Your independent source: one hundred years in 1983 --Erinaceus (msg) 11:16, 6 dic 2017 (CET)

Of course the article is non-neutral point of view but this is not a cause of immediate deletion --Erinaceus (msg) 11:23, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
[@ Erinaceus] It is a crosswiki spam issue, and I have no ability to prosecute a case to the Italian Wikipedia community. Knowing each community's specific method for RfD is too hard, so I have to raise it through {{delete}}. I am not arguing that the company did or did not exist 100 years ago. I am saying that the current article and the repeated linking to cesa.it, cesa1882.it are spam that redirect to greggio.com. These IP addresses are adding their spam to 8 wikis without reliable sources, and the communities are allowing a crafted and elaborate "quality product" campaign to be undertaken through the wikis. Billinghurst (msg) 11:36, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
Well, the article shows just one external link. If this is an official site, it's ok. If not, it should be removed. Just in case, I remove it.
For the rest, what I see is just a very bad and non-neutral article about a (I think) relevant subject. A former message template was actually removed without reason by an IP user.
In any case, I do not see the conditions for any speedy deletion, only a possible standard deletion (I won't agree). --Erinaceus (msg) 11:57, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
{[@ Erinaceus] I am not contesting your decision to not speedy delete. I understand that there should be a process. I am not saying that the subject matter is unworthy of an article if there are reliable and quality sources, but there are none. I am saying that someone is trying to dress-up marketing as an article, based upon an historical artefact that there was a company at a point in time. This article is spam. Billinghurst (msg) 12:05, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
Spam is only detectable from contents. With external links removed, if you don't speak Italian I'm afraid it would be hard for you to tell between actual spam and common non-neutral point of view. It could certainly exist an underlying spamming purpose, but this do not result in patent spam. After all, the article shows a three-years history with just one deletion as duplicated article, at least six current sysops have summarily reviewed it and an independent IP user had only reported it for non-neutrality. The lack of sources is also already reported (Template:F). --Erinaceus (msg) 13:02, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
[@ Erinaceus] I am looking at the same spam occurring across eight other wikis with the same approach, and the same IP addresses. I am looking at the addition of images at Commons, and simultaneous addition to articles at the same wikis. [Follow the wikilinks for that evidence]. I am seeing them avoid placing the articles at enWP, yet they have it at simpleWP. The username of the person who created the article aligns with the current spam url, so they started at itWP 3 years ago, and with that success they are now moving to other wikis. So while I don't read Italian, I do have Google translate for this and the other wikis, and the English version at simple. I am also not new to wikis and the tricks that the spammers play. All that said, I will go with the consensus of the wiki where it is done with eyes wide open, and the broader evidence Billinghurst (msg) 13:26, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
see above reports for link addition and the extent they go to dress it up. Billinghurst (msg) 13:31, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
Your request was accepted on de.wiki but for reasons including a lack of relevance (on that wiki). It was converted into an ordinary deletion request on nl.wiki and openly refused on simple.wiki itself as well as here. Here, as Auntof6 told you over there, there is nothing suggesting or allowing a quick deletion. You may propose an ordinary deletion. I, despite being known as a ferocious deletionist, :-) will not. Sorry --Erinaceus (msg) 14:18, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
I didn't overly expect speedy deletion, I did think that most would be converted into RfD. If that is your preference, then please point me to the preferred page, and I will do that as time permits. Knowing the RfD processes for so many wikis is not possible, so guidance is what is needed from administrators. Billinghurst (msg) 14:45, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
Wikipedia:Regole_per_la_cancellazione#Cancellazioni_standard
Wikipedia:Regole_per_la_cancellazione#Segnalazione --Erinaceus (msg) 15:17, 6 dic 2017 (CET)
I did it for you --Erinaceus (msg) 19:29, 6 dic 2017 (CET)